Friday, June 11, 2010

the autotelic self ... thinking aloud/allowed

Spent some time re-reading a couple of the 'Flow' chapters this morning. I'm thinking about why digital documentary doesn't flow and how it can flow.

According to Csikszentmihalyi (pp205 - 212) flow requires unity with the environment, attention has to be immersed in the environment. The solutions to creating this immersion are put forward as -


  1. focus attention on the obstacle (to flow) and then move them out of the way
     OR
  1. create alternative goals for the user
Experiencing traditional documentary on a computer is disruptive to flow. There is a keyboard and mouse between the viewer and the screen which is totally different to the cinema screen and/or tv. So the computer environment is an expansion of the cinema screen. You can't apply the same rules to both systems. The challenges and opportunities for action that call to the user are different. The keyboard and mouse add this thing called interactivity, a new dimension, that breaks the flow of traditional documentary which relies totally on immersion in the storyworld.

Somehow the storyworld of the documentary needs to expand to include the keyboard and mouse into the environment. At the moment the digital documentary ignores the peripheral devices, pretends they're not there because in the native cinema and tv formats they're not, there is no external distraction to the screen. But perhaps digital documentary needs to find a way to consciously include these in the environment. Somehow in the story ...

Csikszentmihalyi suggests that flow requires the user to be autotelic, 'a self that has self-contained goals' (p209). These are the types of people who experience flow easily in situations. The autotelic personality is able to set their own goals from any given environment, they are required to operate with unselfconscious assurance, they easily feel a part of an environment, they can become immersed in the activity and are interested and involved in the experience easily.  

So, am I not getting into digital documentary thing because I am not this kind of person? I do often rely on other people to set goals for me. I'm not so great at unselfconscious assurance,  in fact I'm terrible. Am I too self conscious in any environment lose myself and to become easily immersed in the interactive environment. 

Perhaps the non-autotelic person will only ever be able to get into story in the cinema/tv situation - darkened room where there is no environment to be self conscious in. Perhaps flow in the digital documentary can only happen for those who find it easy to become immersed in an environment.

The question is then, how can digital documentary make people like me (overly self conscious) feel comfortable and immersed in this environment? If I can answer that then flow: the optimal experience of digital documentary should follow ...





2 comments:

  1. good point about the keyboard and mouse - given these we'll all want to get in and have our say and change the doco's intent no doubt potentially into hundreds of persuadions - yet on the big screen we also interact, emotionally and mentally - and if we're really moved, bingo, on a soul level!
    We want the good guys to beat the bad guys, good to trump over evil, people to fall in love - that sort of thing, from where we sit. Where to you want to lead the viewer's flow and to experience what?

    ReplyDelete
  2. i posted a comment 2ce but it didnt show

    ReplyDelete